Robin, who owns my LinkedIn connections if I leave my firm?

According to a recent online article on LinkedIn account ownership by British solicitor Michael Simkins, this is a new area that the legal profession will be forced to handle in the very near future. (You can read the full article here.)

The Issue

The question is whether the employer or the employee is entitled to control an employee’s LinkedIn account. Simkins writes that, “Client or contact details are only capable of being ‘owned’ if the employer can demonstrate that they amount to confidential information.”

English courts, Simkins says, have ruled in the past that information in Outlook address books amount to information databases and do indeed belong to employers. Since LinkedIn is essentially a web-based database, he believes it is likely that courts may rule on that in a similar fashion.

To my knowledge, no U.S. cases have been brought before the courts relating to LinkedIn -- so far.

iStock_000006889731XSmall.jpgMany companies are currently scrambling to include LinkedIn policies in their employee handbooks. Employees who have built extensive LinkedIn connections would be wise (but may not know) to consider negotiating terms relating to their online network before accepting employment.

Why is this issue important? Two reasons.

First, what does this mean for your own biz dev efforts? Can you take your connections with you if you leave your firm?

Second, with all these issues looming, social media law could become a whole new area of legal expertise (and opportunity for business development), if you are not already on it.

What is your firm doing about this issue? Do you have a policy on LinkedIn connections? Is this a new practice area you are developing? 

Until next time,

Robin

Comments (3)

Read through and enter the discussion by using the form at the end
Jerry Carlton - August 4, 2010 12:09 PM

Check out this article about a LinkedIn lawsuit at:
http://www.tkfpc.com
Regarding: TEKsystems Inc. v. Hammernick et al., case number 0:10-cv-00819, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota.

Robert Scott Lawrence - August 4, 2010 2:07 PM

My initial reaction is that, while the names and contact information of all the firm's clients (including ones I bring in) properly belong to the firm, my private address book -- which includes friends, family, acquaintances, and business contacts -- is nobody's business but my own, and doesn't belong to the firm any more than the thoughts in my head do. Simply posting those contacts online does not grant my firm any kind of proprietary rights in that information. I'd love to see the lawsuit in the U.S. where a company tries to assert ownership rights in professional relationships made during the course of your employment. While they may have a right to inventions you create while employed by them (even, sometimes, when you're not at work), I can see no justification -- and a mountain of privacy concerns -- over any company attempting to gain access to contact information for everyone you know. That, of course, will not stop an aggressive lawyer somewhere from inserting a clause to that effect in an employment contract. And then I guess we'll get to see what the U.S. courts think about it. In light of current federal concerns over the privacy of personal data (e.g., Facebook issues), I have trouble seeing the courts simply rolling over on the issue.

Dave - September 8, 2010 5:12 AM

If I left a company and took a copy of it's contact database with me on a USB drive that would be classed as theft of the companies intellectual property and almost certainly be breach of contract.

Why then is pulling together a list of those same contacts, who I meet in my role as a company representative, suddenly deemed to be my personal contacts and ok to take them.

If I am happy to take a salary whilst collating those contacts at trade shows or seminars paid for by the company, I have to accept I am doing so on behalf of the company. You can't have it both ways.

Post a comment

Fill out this form to add a comment to the discussion
I'd like to leave a comment. is
,
is
,
is
is